And to add a me three to this - I am also with him on this one. On top of things - I might misremember this, but didn't we plan package names to include the github user name at one point of time? So a package name would be user/redis, for example, and there also could be user2/redis?
Johanna On 27 Jul 2016, at 9:05, Matthias Vallentin wrote: >> I actually don't like this that much because some of these can cross >> boundaries and do all sorts of different things in a single plugin. >> It makes more sense to me to leave the naming open. > > I'm with Seth on this one. The reason why I think we should keep the > naming open is that it's the job of the meta data tags to take care of > the grouping. If someone writes a redis package, then they should > apply > the redis package. Encoding this meta data into the package name is > quite limited, however. > > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > bro-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
