On 5/12/17 9:43 PM, Azoff, Justin S wrote: > >> On May 12, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Slagell, Adam J <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 12, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Seth Hall <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'd be fine with that. I think master is quite stable right now anyway >> >> >> I'm pretty sure Vlad is in agreement, but traveling today. I think Justin as >> well, but I should let him speak for himself. > > Yes.. I think the only other thing is that the pointer to the broctl > submodule hasn't been updated lately. > > There are bunch of fixes and a few new features in broctl master that would > be nice to get out to people. > > I just realized since the submodule hasn't been updated the broctl changes > likely aren't running anywhere yet, including our dev/test clusters. If the > submodule pointer can be updated I can put master on our dev/test clusters > and test everything out a bit more. > > >
The broctl pointer was updated recently (after that, we stopped seeing jenkins broctl test failures). _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
