> On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Johanna Amann <[email protected]> wrote: > > The only thing that I would like to avoid (which is obviously separate > from this) is internally remapping variable names to configuration names > in a non-reversible manner; then one suddenly has to think about what to > do when names conflict (several variable names being able to automatically > map to the same configuration name). But - that seem to be separate > concern :)
Still not sure how much of an issue that is, provided the display names are only for display and not used to actually locate/update identifier values. E.g. if a user sees 2 “User Name” fields in a UI, I think we’re still able to fall back on the broxygen documentation comments to provide more context to the user. Or if theres standardized/automatic conventions for these display names that are based on modules/namespacing, I’m not sure how often you’d even see such conflicts, or ’d expect they’d get patched out pretty rapidly by the community when they pop up. - Jon _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
