On 11/6/17 8:16 AM, Seth Hall wrote: > Right now, Bro will print scientific notation in JSON logs but we've > always tended to avoid it in the standard Bro log format. What does > everyone think about switching to allow scientific notation in the > standard log format? Daniel recently did some exploration of various > versions of awk and they all support scientific notation (I think that > was part of my concern a long time ago). > > Thoughts? > > .Seth
Actually, right now Bro uses scientific notation in JSON logs only for very large values (such as 3.1e+15). For values very close to zero (such as 1.2e-7), Bro will write "0" to a JSON log. _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
