> > think of that. I honestly also never liked modifying the values that are > > passed in arguments; this is for example also theoretically possible for > > events, but something that we have avoided to use in practice so far. > > Yeah, and it also won't work for atomic values, at least not since > https://github.com/bro/bro/commit/5b889360705120c9061390214881ea376819c669 > went in. :)
And as far as I can tell that applies to hooks too, true? This is actually a but sneaky - it should not be a problem for Intel::extend_match that Jan mentioned earlier because it is unlikely that someone will just assign a new value to info. But if someone does it will fail. Which, after thinking about it for a few moments seems like the right choice in any case. :) Johanna _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
