On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Jan Grashöfer <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the light of the flexibility that comes with packages, I think > supporting closures would be a nice feature. Was there any fundamental > design decision against supporting closures? I think it's mostly unsupported due to trickiness of implementation (or cowardice) rather than by design decision. Or at least something scared me off when I looked into it a few years ago [1]. Don't remember the details, though I likely didn't give it more than a day or two of thought/effort, so maybe don't let that deter you if you had plans to look into it. - Jon [1] https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1233 _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
