100% agree with you... And what about compiling? Most *nix admins I know are used to compile most of the software their use on their systems (PHP, Samba, Apache, etc.) Autotools basic usage knowledge should be included...
El lun, 29-08-2005 a las 15:56 -0700, Jeremy C. Reed escribió: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, [ISO-8859-1] J. Rafael Gmez G." wrote: > > > I'm agree with Kevin Reiter about that C language is not necessary to admin > > any UNIX but I think that it is necessary to have a good level of shell > > programming. The real question is: What shell should be considered the de > > facto standard for shell programming? csh? ksh? sh? > > Or derivatives as tcsh, bash, o zsh? > > It would be sh. Most shell scripts are written with /bin/sh. We can't > assume that /bin/sh is "ksh" especially since some versions of ksh are > different than other versions of ksh. Also, bashisms would not be > appropriate for base BSD installs. > > I also think that a good level of shell programming is useful. We don't > know yet how basic of Unix essentials and shell programming the certs will > cover yet. The survey was very long as it was and it didn't even get to > details covering "Unix" fundamentals. > > Jeremy C. Reed > > BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links > http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/ -- Juan Rafael Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ BSDCert mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsdcert
