On 29/09/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> sebb wrote:
> > On 29/09/2009, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> >> From what I've understood now, BSF 2.4.x (AKA trunk) is probably not
> >> going to be adapted to Jython 2.5.x, correct?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, correct.
> >
> > AFAIK, there's no interest in developing BSF 2.4 further.
> >
>
> There is,
Sorry, my bad.
I'm sure you already wrote along these lines; I should have checked
the archives.
> I would like to create a final 2.5, which should incorporate
> all fixes for from Issuezilla, plus an engine to access the JSR-223
> engines, and a JSR-223 for allowing JSR-223 hosts to use BSF 2.x
> engines. The idea is to allow existing infrastructures to make the move
> to BSF 3.0 without any force ("organically", step-by-step, whatever
> seems appropriate for those who have invested into BSF 2.x).
>
> Originally, I intended to do these "final tasks" over the summer, but
> have been stuck with a (for me) large project, which still is not
> finished (making Java appear to be a dynamic language for the purpose of
> ooRexx, which itself uses an enhanced version of BSF 2.4 at the moment).
> Because of that I have been quite "quiet" and hum, being frustrated a
> little bit about not having been able to finalize that project.
>
> Let me also say, that I *highly* appreciate all the work and efforts,
> that you - sebb - have invested in the past months to make it happen
> that BSF 3.0 can become a GA release! (I just have wished, that I would
> have been able to help a little bit more in that process, other than
> testing the builds and voting!)
Thanks!
I may be able to help with 2.5.
> Regards,
>
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
