Not really sure ... On 10/12/2009, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Top posting a quick question: is this vote for the 3.0 m2 repo > artifacts still active? If it is, I intend to take a look in the next > day or two. > > -Rahul > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:40 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:40 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 28/10/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> ant elder wrote: > >>>> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:04 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, sebb AT ASF<s...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >>> Please review and vote on the BSF 3.0 RC1 release. > >>>> >>> The artifacts are available at: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.0-RC1/ > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> and the an SVN tag is at: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.0-rc1/ > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> S/// > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > >>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >> Whats there looks good, +1 > >>>> >> > >>>> >> There's no Maven staging repo, could that be added to this vote? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> ...ant > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > We never did sort out the maven artifacts of for the 1.0 release, > >>>> > which means projects using maven cant use the 1.0 release. I did put > >>>> > some artifacts up at > >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-rc1/maven/ during the > >>>> > release vote, could we consider them part of the 1.0 release vote or > >>>> > should we have another vote to release them? There was a question > >>>> > about no license header on one of the generated pom.xml files, but > i'm > >>>> > not sure how to fix that easily and it doesn't seem like a release > >>>> > blocker to me. > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> > >>> Surely the header can just be added to the file before it is deployed? > >>> > >> > >> Fair point, ok I'll do that, and I think I call a vote on releasing > >> them just to make sure its all clean and tidy. > >> > >> ...ant > >> > > > > Ok that is done now, the staging repo is the same as before > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/bsf/3.0-rc1/maven/ which is the one > > from earlier with the only change being the bsf-all jar generated > > pom.xml now has an AL header and is resigned. > > > > Please confirm with a +1 to include these in the 3.0 release. > > > > +1 from me. > > > > ...ant > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
