On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:30:47 +0800 "Yan Zheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > The ENOTEMPTY check in btrfs_rmdir isn't reliable. It's possible that > the backward search finds . or .. at first, then some other directory > entry. In that case, btrfs_rmdir delete . or .. improperly. The > patch also fix a fs_mutex unlock issue in btrfs_rmdir by the way. Thanks, you're right. The original code was before the inode number index, when the backward search was correct. -chris _______________________________________________ Btrfs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/btrfs-devel
