From: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:42:20 -0500
> The kernel is actually worse, because the set/get macros are more complex. > Some live in ctree.h like in the progs, but the nasty ones live in > struct-funcs.c This is really problematic, because you've got these things called "btrfs_item_ptr()" which really isn't a pointer, it's a relative 'unsigned long' offset cast to a pointer. The source of this seems to be btrfs_leaf_data(). And then those things get passed down into the SETGET functions! Then deeper down we have terribly inconsistent things like btrfs_item_nr_offset() and btrfs_item_offset_nr(). Sigh... I'll see what I can do. _______________________________________________ Btrfs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/btrfs-devel
