On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:52:00AM -0700, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: ... Sorry for the delay, this one slipped off my radar until today's email cleanup.
> What I'm wondering is, could I break up the sync of those hundreds > of tables that are in one db into separate syncs for say each ten > tables? And more importantly - would there be any value in this - > would having separate syncs make the each sync iteration a smaller > 'chunk' which bucardo could chrew through more effectively, and > resolve conflicts more efficiently? As long as the tables are not logically linked (e.g. with foreign keys), you can break them apart any way you like. Using smaller syncs *may* help in this case, but it really depends on where all the time is being taken. Certainly, smaller syncs will reduce the time taken to run, and thus reduce the chance of serialization errors. Just how long does the full sync take? -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
