That certainly ends any debate. Thanks! Blake
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Juergen Sauermann < juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi Blake, > > my initial thinking was also that this is a syntax error. > However the ISO standard wants a value error (around page 67):" > > "Pattern V ← B > > Evaluation Sequence: > > If B is not a value, signal value-error." > > /// Jürgen > > > > > On 04/15/2014 07:31 AM, Blake McBride wrote: > > Additionally, while their may be a semantic problem with that code as you > point out, there is utterly nothing wrong with the _syntax_. > > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, <enz...@gmx.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I think it is really is a syntax error >> >> Creating gg as a 'procedure' (returns no value) vs using it as a function >> (returns a value) in coding >> >> But argument can be made that gg has no value >> >> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:54:32 +0200 >> Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: >> >> > Hello Blake, >> > >> > yes, thanks. Fixed in SVN 202. >> > >> > /// Jürgen >> > >> > >> > On 04/12/2014 08:00 PM, Blake McBride wrote: >> > > ∇gg gg created as a 'procedure' >> > > [1] 4 >> > > [2] ∇ >> > > gg >> > > 4 >> > > x←gg use of gg as a 'function' >> > > 4 >> > > SYNTAX ERROR >> > > x←gg >> > > ^ ^ >> > > >> > > I understand what is wrong with gg. The problem is the error message. >> > > I think it is wrong. Shouldn't it be VALUE ERROR ? >> > > >> > > Thanks. >> > > >> > > Blake >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > >
