Does the gg function exist at this time, or is it newly created? On 4 May 2014 20:31, "Blake McBride" <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using Emacs 24.3.1. It comes with Linux Mint. I did not build it > myself. I do have a number of customizations in my .emacs file. > > Okay, I have deleted everything out of my .emacs file except the GNU APL > mode stuff and re-started emacs. > > I started gnu-apl in Emacs, All I typed next is the following: > > ∇gg > C-c C-c > > There is an "Enter" key hit after the gg above. So, all I type is 6 > keystrokes. After the first four keystrokes, emacs brings up the editing > window for the gg function. > Immediately after all 6 keystrokes, in the mini-buffer I get: Current > buffer has no process > > If I then type: > > xx C-c C-c > > the function gets saved as expected. > > Thanks. > > Blake > > > > On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I tried that too. I can't really think of any that could cause this to >> happen. Unless, of course there is a problem with your Emacs. What version >> are you using? Did you build it yourself? >> >> Regards, >> Elias >> On 4 May 2014 20:03, "Blake McBride" <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> No, I am typing del-function name. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I tried this, but I am not able to reproduce this problem. Are you >>>> editing the function using C-c C-f? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Elias >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4 May 2014 07:28, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> While using Emacs mode I found the following small bug. If you edit >>>>> an existing function, move the cursor around, maybe change something, and >>>>> hit C-c C-c it saves the function just fine. However, if you edit an >>>>> existing function and then immediately (without moving the cursor or >>>>> changing anything) C-c C-c I get: >>>>> >>>>> Current buffer has no process >>>>> >>>>> If I simply move the cursor (like ∧F) then C-c C-c works as advertised. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Blake >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
