On 25 November 2014 at 14:06, Jay Foad <jay.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 November 2014 at 13:38, Juergen Sauermann > <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: >> I have read the IBM binding rules a number of times but they seem not to >> help. The problem of these rules is >> that they give different results in the cases where / is an operator and >> where / is a function. > > In IBM APL2 / is always an operator.
For example: 1 2/¨3 4 ⍝ GNU APL, NARS2000 and Dyalog: parse as 1 2(/¨)3 4 3 4 4 1 2/¨3 4 ⍝ APL2: parse as (1 2/)¨3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 Jay.