On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Mike Duvos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nick, > > APL historically has required consecutive numbers to be separated by at > least one character that can't be part of a number. > > This differs from the lex approach of matching the longest legal thing, > and not caring about the next thing beginning immediately thereafter. > > Since doing it differently doesn't add any new functionality, it's > probably best to just stick with the way it's always been done. > > Such occurrences in peoples code are almost always typos, and it's best to > tell them about them. > Agreed.
