On 17 March 2016 at 22:16, Juergen Sauermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe all this gives us a lot of freedom to extend GNU APL *within > the boundaries of the APL syntax* so that I > can't see why we would need to change that syntax of APL if all we want to > do is extend its functionality. > What are your thoughts of allowing the use of characters outside of Quad-AV? Regards, Elias
