is there a preferred order to compiling the apl binary and libapl does doing one before the other deprive something of something? :) all file sizes seem the exact same except of course libapl.h/.la/.so and bin/apl depending on whether --with-libapl is used
i am doing the libapl first then the apl binary --- make distclean gives a lot of rm -f Makefile make[2]: Leaving directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src/testcases' make[2]: Entering directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src' Makefile:901: .deps/apl-Archive.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:902: .deps/apl-ArrayIterator.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:903: .deps/apl-Assert.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:904: .deps/apl-Avec.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:905: .deps/apl-Backtrace.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:906: .deps/apl-Bif_F12_FORMAT.Po: No such file or directory .... i guess using make clean is the preferred way?
