> My > > 1 / / 1 1 ⍴ 1 > > example was only meant to demonstrate that in APL2 an operator can have > another operator (in this case itself) as left argument. And in that case > binding > the leftmost 1 to the left / operator would be, at least IMHO and referring > only > to the language reference manual, as valid as binding the left / operator to > the > right / operator.
I don't think so. See the discussion of "Name and Symbol Binding" starting on p33, and in particular on p35: "There is no binding between operators. In the expression ,¨/ catenate binds as left operand to the each operator, and then the derived function ,¨ binds as left operand to the slash operator." Jay.
