Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster (2005-12-29) writes:
>
>> I'm editing a dtx file that ends like this:
> [...]
>> % \HistVersion{2002/05/10 v1.0}
>> % \begin{itemize}
> [...]
>> With transient-mark-mode enabled, I set a mark at the \ before
>> HistVersion and moved point one line down; then I pressed M-;
>> (comment-dwim). This is what I get:
> [...]
>> % % \HistVersion{2002/05/10 v1.0}
>> % %
>> \begin{itemize}
> [...]
>> This is what I mean ;-):
> [...]
>> % % \HistVersion{2002/05/10 v1.0}
>> % %
>> % \begin{itemize}
>
> Don't you rather mean
> % ^^A \HistVersion{2002/05/10 v1.0}
> % \begin{itemize}
> ?
Err, yes, I guess. I'm never sure which comments are stripped (or
rather I always tend to think that comment signs separated by more than
one whitespace are kept, and forget the special comment sign), but
moving a line from the documentation part to the implementation part is
clearly wrong.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
