Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2006-02-19) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Because `TeX-command-buffer' will point to the original file and not >>> to the region file after e.g. LaTeX was run with `C-c C-r'. >>> `(TeX-active-master)', however, will return the region file. >> >> Uh, so what? You can always use >> (with-current-buffer TeX-command-buffer (TeX-active-master)) >> in case you need the master. > > D'oh. I'll tell you when I'm done bashing my head against the table > plate. > > Anyway, an easy fix for the reported problem would be the following > patch: > > The normalization of strings for comparison destroys some information > which might be relevant, but maybe it is better than messing around > with `TeX-command-buffer'. I'll have to look deeper into what > functions would have to be changed if we use the latter, but as far as > I can already see it would be at least `TeX-active-buffer' besides > `TeX-next-error'.
What we _currently_ do is "messing around", namely with `TeX-master'. Using `TeX-command-buffer' would just read-access variables. And the current variant causes several strange hickups and unexpected things to happen semi-permanently. If the user explicitly set TeX-master by file variable or C-c C-_, it is a reasonable expectation that AUCTeX will not mess with that setting. Although I am responsible for the current `TeX-next-error' behaviour, I think it might have been quite the wrong fix for the encountered problem. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
