Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Andreas Matthias (2007-04-03) writes:
>
>> Andreas Matthias wrote:
>>
>>> After doing `M-x preview-buffer' in the following example, y_1 is
>>> being previewed but /not/ y_2.
>>
>>> \documentclass{article}
>>> \usepackage{microtype}
>>>
>>> \begin{document}
>>> $y_1$
>>> \textls{XXX}
>>> $y_2$
>>> \end{document}
>>>
>>> %%% Local Variables:
>>> %%% mode: TeX-PDF
>>> %%% End:
>>
>> I have updated Emacs, AUCTeX, microtype, pdftex; cleaned up my texmf-tree.
>> But still the same. The second preview is missing. Can someone
>> confirm this?
>
> Hm, this is unreproducible with
>
> article.cls 2004/02/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
> size10.clo 2004/02/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
> microtype.sty 2007/01/21 v2.0 Micro-typography with pdfTeX (RS)
> keyval.sty 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
> microtype.cfg 2007/01/14 v2.0 microtype main configuration file (RS)
> preview.sty 2007/03/25 CVS-1.123 (AUCTeX/preview-latex)
>
> Emacs : GNU Emacs 22.0.96.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20)
> of 2007-03-23 on neutrino
> Package: preview-1.280
>
> AUCTeX-version "2007-03-11"
>
I could reproduce it with my AUCTeX version. Seemingly some PDFTeX
warning that has a format fooling the file name detector.
Again. This is really a nuisance. Did you already check in the
change that just relied on a closing paren and nothing else? Maybe we
should just stop detecting closing parens at all, and when an error
occurs, we pop the stack until we find a corresponding buffer with the
right information. If we don't, we repeat that checking every file we
find in that process. Ok, not too good an idea, as we'll be checking
every style file...
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
