* David Kastrup (2007-10-03) writes: > Hm? Just explaining the available semantics by referring to the actual > values is not actually doing anything different. While I agree that > one can use such a customize-only explanation in the manual, I think > that the DOC string for a variable should help with understanding the > code, not just the customization.
The doc string shows up in the customization buffer. And that's where I wanted to have a description for the user, not the developer. I could perhaps as a compromise add the developer-aimed documentation as a comment to the defcustom code. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
