Rodolfo Medina (2008-11-13) writes: >>> The problem only occurs when the displayed equation is two or more lines >>> long, and only for the text succeding the equation, not for the preceding >>> text. So: > >>> bla bla bla >>> $$ long equation >>> = over two lines$$ >>> bla bla <M-q> >>> bla >>> >>> becomes: >>> >>> bla bla bla >>> $$ long equation >>> = over two lines$$ bla bla bla
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> In case of the preceding text it is easy to find the paragraph boundary >>> because there is a line starting with $$. Determination of paragraph >>> starts or separators usually works by looking at the start of a line. >>> In AUCTeX there is also code that looks at the end of a line, but this >>> is only used in LaTeX mode. Plain TeX mode relies on Emacs facilities >>> for filling. > > [...] in LaTeX mode $$ is unsupported. Now I see that the problem cannot be solved. But here I want to express my complain for the fact that plain TeX is always neglected compared to LaTeX. I don't find that right. After all, D. Knuth has written plain TeX and not LaTeX. Plain TeX users are helpless with their problems. I wish I had the skills to fix them myself but unfortunately haven't, but expert people should not in my opinion create facilities only and only for LaTeX, which is a mere sun of plain TeX. I understand that this happens because so many people use LaTeX and so few people use plain TeX, but this reason is not sufficient IMHO. Thanks, bye Rodolfo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
