Tassilo Horn wrote: >> Personally I think this is bad practice. > > Why?
Well, what if you make a typo and use a function that is really undefined? > As said, all those style files use LaTeX-* and TeX-* vars and > functions defined by AUCTeX's core. However, the style files can't be > required individually, but AUCTeX itself loads them dynamically > depending on the \usepackages and \documentclass you use in your LaTeX > document. Why can't the style files require whatever AUCTeX files they need? > Well, AUCTeX releases have a (setq byte-compile-warnings nil) in a > custom lpath.el that's used when byte-compiling anyway. Which makes this whole exercise rather laughable, doesn't it? "All releases must ship with no warnings." <Disables warnings> "Job done!" _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
