Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: >>> Or you could turn them into macros. >> Indeed, that looks like a typical use-case for macros, but I'm rather >> sure that there's a good reason that the auto parser stuff is like it >> is. David? > > Whatever the reason, looking at the code of TeX-auto-add-type, I think > it *really* should be turned into a macro, and use defvar/defalias > instead of set/fset.
Yes, I've done that now in a local branch. Seems to be the way to go, but I need to do some more testing before pushing out that change. >> While we are at it: David, is there any reason why somebody would >> want to set TeX-install-font-lock to 'ignore nowadays so that >> font-latex is not loaded? > > Would that make AUCTeX use tex-mode.el's font-lock rules? TeX-install-font-lock has 3 possible values. font-latex-setup uses AUCTeX's rules, tex-font-setup uses tex-mode's rules, and ignore doesn't set up any font-lock rules. (So my question was a bit misleading.) font-latex has some nice goodies like being able to add custom font-locking rules for your own macros/environments very easily. > Maybe `require-lazy' would be a better name for it, but in any case as > long as it's not implemented, its name doesn't matter much. Yup. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
