>> "Mos" == Mos <Mos> writes: > Hi Uwe, > 2014-02-25 18:16 GMT+01:00 Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es>: >> >> I am still using auctex-11.84 in Xemacs 21.5.33 without a problem. >> >> Now I want also to use auctex with GNU emacs 24 and I have several >> problems. >>
> Why don't you use a more recent AUCTeX version, or the development > version if you feel bold enough? We still try to keep compatibility > with XEmacs 21.4.15/17 or later. Short answer: because AUCTeX is the *most* important lisp package I use and right now I can barely effort to run into problems with it. Long answer: you are right and not only this I should also upgrade the Xemacs official pkg[1] (Xemacs has/had for years a package system similar to ELPA) > It seems to me the format of `TeX-command-list' hasn't changed > since then. Ok, but custom does cause a problem so I decided to separate the custom setting for X(emacs) and GNU emacs and some problems are gone.. > Using my git time machine I managed to compile AUCTeX 11.84, and > opening a LaTeX file with GNU Emacs 24.3 appears a *Compile-Log* > buffer reporting some warnings from `font-latex.el', but I don't get > the error you ran into. Are you sure? Now (after having separated the custom variables) I see the following error in the COmpile log emacs/site-lisp/packages/auctex-11.84/font-latex.elc:Error: Don't know how to compile nil then in a latex file the menus are there, I can run latex, but the file is in fundamental mode! With debug-on-error to t, I obtain an error which I attach. Uwe
auc-bug2
Description: Binary data
> Bye,
> Mosè
Footnotes:
[1] there was a GPL issue for almost a year and then a change in hte
VCS system, ok no more excuses :'(
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
