* Mosè Giordano (2014-10-19) writes: > Thank you. I've just noticed also insertion of other environments, > like itemize, gives weird results when > `comment-auto-fill-only-comments' is non-nil. Does it make sense to > let-bind this variable to nil when calling `indent-new-comment-line' > in the line referenced by Piet?
Actually I'm a bit surprised that the behavior of `comment-indent-new-line' is changed in such a way by the value of `comment-auto-fill-only-comments'. Especially since the doc string of `comment-indent-new-line' does not mention anything about it. Anyway, setting `comment-auto-fill-only-comments' to nil would work but might be a bit strange because it does not seem to be directly related to the behavior of `comment-indent-new-line'. An alternative could be to call `comment-indent-new-line' only when point is actually in a comment. But this will mean more code on our side. I don't have a clear preference for any solution. Perhaps let-binding the variable might currently be the saver alternative. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
