2014-11-27 18:58 GMT+01:00 Uwe Brauer <[email protected]>:
> Hi Mosè,
>
>
>    > Hi Uwe and all,
>    > 2014-11-27 11:39 GMT+01:00 Uwe Brauer <[email protected]>:
>
>    > I hope it's clear I wrote those messages in a hurry, just to give the 
> idea.
>
> I was going to write you. I changed nullp to null applied your old patch and
> it did not work as expected. *However* your *new* patch
>
>    > I changed my mind. I propose the attached patch which restores (full)
>    > compatibility with the old version of LaTeX-label: the optioanl `type'
>    > argument select the look up table to be used for the default prefix of
>    > the label, if it's nil (or absent) you are always prompted for a
>    > label.  AUCTeX code always uses the appropriate value for the type
>    > argument, but users will also be able to force the insertion of the
>    > label (or continue to use the old syntax of the function).
>
> Works beautifully! Thanks for all your efforts, I appreciate it a lot.

Ok, patch applied then.

> (I still prefer some days more of testing before trying to release a
> Xemacs pkg)

Thank you!

Bye,
Mosè



_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

Reply via email to