> returning also empty strings. This change is not even mentioned in > the Incompatible Lisp Changes section of the NEWS file.
Lots of changes aren't mentioned. Only the ones that we expect to be noticed are mentioned. > For the time being I don't have a solution, apart from defining > `TeX-completing-read-multiple' as the old version of > `completing-read-multiple', or someone fixing > `completing-read-multiple' upstream, at least making > trimming optional. IIUC you always need a leading \, so you could simply always add a leading backslash if one is missing. Of course, I'm not sure that IUC. > Would it be possible to make trimming optional (off by default), using > an optional argument? I'd rather we don't go down that path. > In AUCTeX we support all Emacs versions starting from 21, so a new > mandatory argument wouldn't be a good idea for us. FWIW, this code only works as intended in Emacs>=22 (since crm-separator didn't exist in Emacs-21). Stefan _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex