jfbu <j...@free.fr> writes: Hi Jean-François,
> as I said to Mosè: perhaps in the future, some modifications could be > considered. Yes, absolutely. For example, it wouldn't require much effort to allow entries of the form (REGEX . FUNCTION) in addition to (REGEX . STRING). For such an entry, FUNCTION would be called and had to return an appropriate description string. That function could check, e.g., `major-mode', to see if this is plain TeX, LaTeX, or whatever and provide better help. That would certainly be feasible. I just don't have enough (La)TeX knowledge to be able to judge which descriptions and hints are still relevant, which ones are outdated, and which ones are missing. So that's a point where you could help a lot. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex