Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: >>>> "David" == David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > > > Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: > >> Hello > >> > >> The following problem only occurs in GNU emacs 24.5 or 25.0.50. > >> > >> I have two files: > >> > >> The first is saved in latin-1 but its header state > >> \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} > >> > >> And the other is the other way around > >> saved in UTF8 header is > >> > >> \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} > >> > >> > >> Both are displayed correctly in Xemacs and but not in GNU emacs. > > > I have a hard time understanding what you mean by "displayed correctly" > > when the display does not correspond to what LaTeX would output. > > > I thought, that sending the latex files would have been enough. I attach > the screenshots. > > > > Why are you lying to LaTeX/Emacs about the document encoding? > > And what do you hope to achieve by Emacs ignoring this? > > This is not on purpose of course, so this could occur if one has > either a very large header and forgets what coding has been selected > (this is lame I know) or more realistically you have a multi file > documentation and don't recall its encoding. > > However there is one thing I just have to add. Maybe I was «spoiled» > in the past by Xemacs/x-symbol behavior which displayed any coding > correctly but internally had the files saved in ascii mode. (Like > running iso-iso2tex on every save).
So you have X-Symbol convert the buffers to pure ASCII input for LaTeX but load the inputenc package in your document anyway, specifying some completely random encoding that's a superset of ASCII and has nothing to do with the buffer encoding. > Of course thinking about it again, you are right. This is a bad habit. I cannot rule out that X-Symbol's operation is incompatible with that of latexenc.el. I have a hard time considering that a bug of latexenc.el, though. > So this is not a bug. > > I could solve the issue of the wrongly displayed coding by just > removing the incorrect header and reopening the file. > > > BTW how else could this wrong coding be repaired? I am asking because > I have encountered similar problems in non latex files, which have > been modified by Xemacs. You can load a file with a particular encoding by using C-x RET c latin-1 RET C-x C-f filename RET for example. You can change the coding system for saving by using C-x RET f latin-9 RET for example. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex