Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: Hi Uwe,
> > Given that it doesn't work and produces even wrong results, I removed > > the complete feature, i.e., the values multi-level and invisible. I > > don't see how it could be made working without parsing the actual math > > expressions and incrementally computing the right `raise' values. > > What? Do I understand correctly you removed the feature that $a^b$ is > displayed correctly (that is b raised ^ invisible), because it does > not work for the (rare) case of nested expressions like $a^b^c$? Yes, exactly. > Please don't. The invisible feature is very nice and as I said the > case $a^b^c$ is very rare. Sorry, but I think there's no value in a feature which only works in the simplest cases and might be wrong otherwise. Have a look at Gennady's screenshots. There are examples where its completely confusing with `multi-level' and would definitely make you read something else than what has been written with `invisible'. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
