Hi Pierre,
2017-09-14 7:55 GMT+02:00 Pierre Lorenzon <de...@pollock-nageoire.net>:
> As if second \input
> \input{../../Exercices/Ensembles/Applications-Proprietes}
>
> were not parsed when first one
>
> \input{Introduction}
>
> is. In fact looking carefully at regexp used to match \\input
> which is part of the LaTeX-auto-regexp-list variable, it
> clearly appears that an path like \input{../../something} will
> not be parsed.
I can reproduce the error and confirm your analysis.
> Question is why? When LaTex allows inputs with so complexe
> paths, why are they not parse by auctex?
It's hard to answer the question: that regexp has been there for more
than 20 years now ;-)
I don't have the time to do it now (I also have a flaky Internet
connection in this period), but if someone wants to tackle this issue,
I fixed something similar for \addbibresource a few months ago:
* b2f69e18 (2017-03-31) Fix detection of bibliography files with
dots in path
Please, also add a test. Maybe this could be an occasion to review
similar regexps (for \include, \bibliography, etc), or maybe have a
common variable for all this cases.
Bye,
Mosè
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
