Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > Hi David, > > 2018-02-16 10:39 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >> Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> We should make sure AUCTeX doesn't fundamentally use dynamic binding, >>> in order to later switch to lexical binding. >> >> You have to pick one or the other for the equivalent of closures. >> >> I do think we have a few cases of those that would benefit from lexical >> binding. Should I go over them? > > Are you volunteering to fix this issue? If so, please go ahead :-)
Uh, _fix_ this "issue"? This is going to throw a real spanner into the works of whoever plans keeping AUCTeX working on XEmacs. Or it may incentivize someone to implement lexical binding on it. One of those. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
