Ikumi: It does appear to have fixed the problem. I am no longer getting the warnings.
Thanks for the patch. Michael > On Jan 7, 2021, at 6:17 AM, Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Itaï, Luke, Braun, > > Sorry for late response. It seems that I managed to fix the bug of > preview-latex you reported before. I don't speak Postscript and the fix > is totally heuristic, but it simply works, at least for me. > > The attached patch removes a newline in the middle of initial string > sent to ghostscript. This newline was interpreted as a delimeter as > ghostscript, thus ghostscript responded twice to the initial string, if > my speculation is right, which led to a spurious prompt from > ghostscript. > > Could you please test whether this patch fixes the problem on your side > if possible? > > Best regards, > Ikumi Keita > > <patch> -------------------------- Michael Braun, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Marketing, and Corrigan Research Professor Cox School of Business Southern Methodist University Dallas, TX 75275 [email protected] _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
