Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > >> Do you have an idea about the performance hit? > > Unfortunatetly, no. I just tried several examples by hand and checked > that "make check" passes. They worked smoothly so I expect there isn't > serious performance problem.
There is `benchmark-run' but I don't think the performance hit is big enough to go through the trouble and benchmark it. >> And while we're at it, we'll have to take care of this comment in >> `LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries': > >> ;; XXX: Here we assume we are dealing with \verb which >> ;; expects the delimiter right behind the command. >> ;; However, \lstinline can also cope with whitespace as >> ;; well as an optional argument after the command. > >> Other packages like fancyvrb and minted do the same: Inline verb macros >> can have an optional and a mandatory argument. So the regexp fun will >> continue :-) > > OMG! 😖 :-) > Anyway, I'd like to commit the attached revised fix along with some > additional regression tests if no one objects. Yes, please go ahead. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
