[I've removed <[email protected]> to reduce the X-Posting] Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > >> I'm not sure about 1. I haven't checked but this behavior was there >> probably forever and we don't have a smart filling for equations w/o >> alignment. Do we want to pass this to Emacs standard filling rules? > > I think standard filling isn't so bad. It does the job mostly > satisfactorily, at least for me. That sounds good. >> About 2., we're talking about these environments, right: > >> ("equation*") ("gather") ("gather*") >> ("gathered") ("multline") ("multline*") > >> The reason I'm asking is I was also thinking about a third solution >> which can be in the styles. There, we can check if user has removed the >> LaTeX standard environments from `LaTeX-indent-environment-list' and >> then make a decision. Essentially in amsmath.el: > >> (when (or (assoc "equation" LaTeX-indent-environment-list) >> (assoc "displaymath" LaTeX-indent-environment-list)) >> <add other environments to `LaTeX-indent-environment-list'>) > >> What do you think, does this make sense? > > Hmm, that looks a bit ad-hoc, but would work for most practical cases. > Do you plan to have similar conditional for envs with alignment such as > "array" and "eqnarray" as well? If so, it would be consistent and make > sense. After some reconsideration, I vote for putting all environments into `LaTeX-indent-environment-list'. This would give users and developers the maximum flexibility -- my idea above is asking for unhappy customers ;-) Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
