Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: >> You mean in case a user says: "Dammit AUCTeX, I know what I'm doing, >> insert what I type!" > > Rather, "What happened? Not sure, but I type $ again in case I actually > did something wrong instead of typing $ correctly." ;-) That seems to be a different user from the one I meant ;-) >> Regardless of this, I think adding the cases entries above to >> `texmathp-tex-commands-default' would make sense and cures the issue at >> hand. WDYT? > > I'm reluctant to take this approach. If `texmathp' regards the first > column of those envs as non-math, it invalidates math-mode aware > features such as automatic switching between \mathrm and \textrm for C-c > C-f C-r, providing {}-pair for "_" and "^" with non-nil > `TeX-electric-sub-and-superscript'. Yes, one side of the cases will suffer. > Then, how about adding supplementary instruction to the message which > `TeX-insert-dollar' shows? For example, > Math mode started with `...' cannot be closed with dollar. You can > insert it anyway by C-q $. I'd suggest to say "You can insert it anyway by C-u $" which is more in line with the docstring of `TeX-insert-dollar'. Does it make sense? Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
