Following up myself. >>>>> Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes: > (2) `LaTeX-verbatim-p' is currently used only in > `fill-nobreak-predicate', `LaTeX-search-forward-comment-start' and > `TeX-in-comment' (through `TeX-verbatim-p-function'):
Sorry, there is another instance of usage in `TeX-insert-dollar'. That is safe for the proposed change for `LaTeX-verbatim-p', too. > (By the way, as written in the comment of the patch, I don't understand > the reason why the while loop in `LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries' goes > back to the previous line. Is there any \verb variant, say in fancyverb > or fvextra, which allows newline in its argument?) I misunderstood the role of `(forward-char -1)'. (^_^;) It passes over the backslash. Going back to the previous line is just an unintentional side effect, `(bobp)' in front of `(forward-char -1)' should actually be `(bolp)'. Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
