Hi Ikumi, On Wed, Nov 08 2023 18:43, Ikumi Keita wrote: > Hi Tony, sorry for late response.
no worries; thanks for giving this a look! > Thank you for proposal. I think that AUCTeX can accept it and it > requires copyright assignment. Have you signed FSF copyright assignment > form before? If you haven't and want to have your proposal incorporated > into AUCTeX, please follow this instruction: > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future I was almost going to say yes, but turns out I haven't! I've now signed the papers and sent them back. >> One thing that seems related is that the function claims that it also >> matches arguments of the form `(<number>)', but the regular expression >> that's used > >> "\\([[{<]\\)\\([1-9]\\)\\([]}>]\\)" > >> does not contain any matches for simple parentheses. I don't know >> whether I'm missing something here, so I didn't change this. > > It seems to me that it's just a bug. I think that tex-fold.el should be > corrected to include "(" and ")" in the regexp first, and your proposed > change should follow it. I'll do the former soon. Sounds great, thanks! I will post an updated patch based on that as soon as I have heard back from the FSF regarding the copyright assignment. Tony -- Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/ _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
