Hi Arash and Michael,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes:
>> To developers: How about removing this check by the attached patch
>> (which may be a bit radaical change)?
> My suggestion is not to do it now. Can you think of a sort of advice
> around the `TeX-LaTeX-sentinel' function?
OK. As Michael suggested to have customizable regexp, my next proposal
is the attached patch. What do you think about it?
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
index 357dbb58..8865d011 100644
--- a/tex.el
+++ b/tex.el
@@ -709,6 +709,13 @@ commands."
:group 'TeX-command
:type 'boolean)
+(defcustom TeX-LaTeX-sentinel-banner-regexp
+ "^\\(\\*\\* \\)?J?I?p?\\(La\\|Sli\\)TeX\\(2e\\)? \
+\\(Version\\|ver\\.\\|<[0-9/-]*\\(?:u[^>]*\\)?>\\)"
+ "Regexp to identify the banner line in the LaTeX output."
+ :group 'TeX-output
+ :type 'regexp)
+
;;; Portability.
(defmacro TeX--if-macro-fboundp (name then &rest else)
@@ -8463,8 +8470,7 @@ Rerun to get mark in right position\\." nil t)
"%s" "You should run LaTeX again to synchronize exercise properties")
(setq TeX-command-next TeX-command-default))
((re-search-forward
- "^\\(\\*\\* \\)?J?I?p?\\(La\\|Sli\\)TeX\\(2e\\)? \
-\\(Version\\|ver\\.\\|<[0-9/-]*\\(?:u[^>]*\\)?>\\)" nil t)
+ TeX-LaTeX-sentinel-banner-regexp nil t)
(let* ((warnings (and TeX-debug-warnings
(TeX-LaTeX-sentinel-has-warnings)))
(bad-boxes (and TeX-debug-bad-boxes
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
