Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > Marco Falconi <[email protected]> writes: > >> I have a custom definition of math macros to be folded. It is the >> following (taken from .emacs in the customize part, I have set it >> using customize): >> >> '(LaTeX-fold-math-spec-list >> (quote >> (("[{1}/{2}]" >> ("frac" "tfrac")) >> ("[{1}⇣{2}]" >> ("underset")) >> ("[{1}⇡{2}]" >> ("overset")) >> ("︷[{1}]" >> ("underbrace")) >> ("√[{1}]" >> ("sqrt"))))) >> >> In the ones with two arguments (frac, tfrac, underset, overset), the >> first argument gets fontified in the folded string, but the second one >> is not fontified (in the unfolded string, everything is fontified >> correctly). This macro for example has such behavior: >> >> \underset{\hslash\to 0}{ \longrightarrow} >> >> The macros with just one argument are fontified correctly also when folded. > > Hi Marco, > > I can't reproduce what you're describing. For me, a minimal .tex file > looks like this: > > x > > > Here is the code of the file: > > \documentclass[10pt]{article} > > \usepackage{amsmath} > > \begin{document} > > \begin{verbatim} > (setq LaTeX-fold-math-spec-list > (append '(("[{1}/{2}]" > ("frac" "tfrac")) > ("[{1}⇣{2}]" > ("underset")) > ("[{1}⇡{2}]" > ("overset")) > ("√[{1}]" > ("sqrt"))) > LaTeX-fold-math-spec-list)) > \end{verbatim} > > $\frac{1}{2} \tfrac{1}{2} \overset{1}{2} > \underset{\hslash\to 0}{ \longrightarrow} > \sqrt{9}$ > > \end{document} > > What I did was: > 1) Open a new tex file > 2) Eval the setq form (put cursor after the last parenthesis and hit > `C-x C-e' > 3) Hitting `M-x TeX-fold-mode RET' and `C-c C-o C-b'.
(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) More information was requested which was not provided. Therefore I'm closing this report. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
