Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> writes: >> I was disabling some of the automatic setup. My original purpose of this >> was to try to reduce my emacs startup time. > > In an ideal ELPA world, startup is fast because the automatic setup is > cheap (just a few autoloads and such). So if the automatic setup is too > slow, that can be for one of two reasons: > - some package(s)'s setup is too expensive. You should then disable the > offending package's startup (by setting package-load-list), and report > the problem to the package's author. > - each package's setup is fast but the overall setup ends up still > too slow. Then please M-x report-emacs-bug complaining that ELPA's > automatic setup time is too expensive and needs to be re-designed. > >>> Auto-installing a list of packages seems mostly unrelated to whether >>> (and how) you configure them, tho. >> It does seem that way, but it is convenient (and I'm probably not the one >> to argue on behalf of use-package). > > Similarly, I don't see why use of use-package would imply that you > disable the automatic setup done by ELPA. use-package should > complement it, not replace it. > >> I decided to go to extra length to not run (package-initialize) because it >> was significantly slowing my emacs start time and running >> (package-initialize t) made it start faster. > > I would appreciate if you could investigate the actual source of slow > down, because it's something that shouldn't happen,
No more comments, I'm therefore closing this report. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
