Hi Paul,
"Paul D. Nelson" <[email protected]> writes:
> Thanks Raghuzar. The issue is the result of this change:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> diff --git a/tex-fold.el b/tex-fold.el
> index 766270ef..78e5b822 100644
> --- a/tex-fold.el
> +++ b/tex-fold.el
> @@ -901,6 +901,12 @@ TYPE can be either `env' for environments, `macro' for
> macros or
> (goto-char (1+ start))
> (LaTeX-find-matching-end)
> (point))
> + ((eq type 'math)
> + (goto-char (1+ start))
> + (if (zerop (skip-chars-forward "A-Za-z@"))
> + (forward-char)
> + (skip-chars-forward "*"))
> + (point))
> (t
> (goto-char start)
> (TeX-find-macro-end)))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The intent here was that "math macros" built-in to tex-fold don't take
> arguments, but this is not the case for the custom one you provide.
>
>> (setq TeX-fold-math-spec-list `((,(lambda (text) (propertize text 'face
>> '(underline))) ("underline"))))
>
> Is there a reason to prefer this vs. the same with
> TeX-fold-macro-spec-list in place of TeX-fold-math-spec-list?
The reason for why it is in TeX-fold-math-spec-list is that when I
started with Emacs I stole it from Tecosaur's config. There are quite a
few function specs in my TeX-fold-math-spec-list e.g. for sqrt, frac,
mathcal, mathfrak and mathbb etc and most of them are relevant only for
math. Should they be moved to TeX-fold-macro-spec-list?
> Paul
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
