Tim Ruffing <[email protected]> writes:
> I've tested this, and this works in this specific case.
Thanks.
> But are you really suggesting this as a fix?
The way I see it this is a bug in latexenc.el which we should try to fix
anyway. That would basically improve the current state.
> I feel this is building a hack on top of another.
Maybe, OTOH, mule-conf.el which adds
("\\.\\(tex\\|ltx\\|dtx\\|drv\\)\\'" . latexenc-find-file-coding-system)
to `file-coding-system-alist' is pre-loaded in Emacs. So I would argue
we're relying on Emacs' default behavior here. And if people remove
that entry, they should know what they're doing.
> If AUCTeX needs the master file to be open, then it just should open
> it and not rely on latexenc to open it.
Will take a closer look at this later, but remember that RefTeX should
also work without AUCTeX, so this point isn't much relevant.
> Your change doesn't solve the issue if any of the following happens:
> * latexenc-dont-use-TeX-master-flag is t
> * latexenc will be removed or changed in the future
> * the \addbibresource commands is not in the same file as
> \usepackage{biblatex}, see the test case in the attached zip.
> (Again, extract it to some folder, cd into the folder with the tex
> files, and run `emacs --init-directory=. --no-splash`)
I see your point, but I think these are sort of corner cases, given how
many times they were raised in the past. I currently don't have the
time and energy to solve this issue in a way which can deal with all the
cases above, but I'll be happy to review and install such a change.
Patches are welcome.
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
