Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I propose the following doc patch (last attachment).
Looks fine, thanks. You might want to add version numbers. I confirmed that the dtksh bug still exists in Solaris 10. > And I propose that your patch be reverted and replaced by something > mildly less ugly (Stepan, did you want to propose a patch to this > extent?). If we can come up with something nicer that still avoids the bugs, that'd be good. But let's not revert the patch until we have something nicer in hand.
