On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:35:28 Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 20:46, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > try naming it "foo_SCRIPTS" instead ?  then you'll have a --foodir=
> > configure option iirc.
> 
> So there's no standard way to install non-architecturally-dependent
> executables?

what i described is standard.  automake gets the directory name from the first 
part (what comes before the "_") and figures out how to treat the files via 
the second part (the primary -- what comes after the "_").  the automake 
manual on the automake homepage describes all of this.

if you're trying to put things into diff paths based on the primary, i dont 
think that works -- that's not how automake is designed.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to