On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, at 10:18 PM, Sam James wrote: >> On 5 Nov 2022, at 22:37, Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> I would send a patch for the original issue but I'm wondering how to handle >> freestanding (see big comment above _AC_C_C89_TEST_GLOBALS).
Yeah, we can't include <stdlib.h> here, but it should be OK to add a manual declaration of free (as I did in bf5a75...) -- there was already a manual declaration of malloc, and free doesn't even need size_t. >> We need another one (<assert.h>) I think for _Static_assert in >> _AC_C_C11_TEST_GLOBALS too, up until C23? I think this should be fine as is; in C11, _Static_assert is a keyword / special form, so it's safe to use without <assert.h>. IIUC the change in C23 is to make static_assert also available without <assert.h>? zw
