Well, does that half-sentence that I added above make it clearer? Yes it does, thanks.
With -local, there is no ordering guarantee (typically they are run early, but with parallel make, there is no way to be sure of that), How about saying that explicitly? It's an implication that will not be immediately obvious to many readers. That exact text (with the final comma changed to a period) seems good to me. > (b) Shouldn't it be "Some targets also have a way to run another target"? Hmm, is that just a very nitpicky remark or does it bear some meaning No unusual meaning, I had just managed to confuse myself. Just ignore it, sorry. Thanks, k